Increase the Lawn's Actual Open Time
The lawn should generally remain open except during necessary repair, turf establishment, or clearly identified safety concerns.
A resident-led, nonpartisan community initiative
The central lawn at Zhenhua Park has been unavailable for extended periods in the name of lawn maintenance. We support necessary maintenance, but this public space should also be available for residents, children, families, seniors, and responsible pet owners to use.
You can join the OpenChat without publicly sharing your real name or phone number.
A park should not be judged only by how perfect its grass looks, but by how often residents can actually use it.
A public lawn should not only look good. It should be available for the public to use.The issue
Zhenhua Park is a recently reopened neighborhood park, and its central lawn is one of its most important open activity spaces.
Based on long-term observations by nearby residents, the lawn appears to have been unavailable for much of the park's existence. This is a resident observation, not an official city statistic.
Long or unclear closures reduce the practical value of a public facility.
Missing ropes, unclear notices, or inconsistent site conditions can also create confusion and conflict between residents.
This initiative is asking for transparent, proportionate, evidence-based management, not an end to maintenance.
Practical changes
Five management changes that can be discussed, implemented, and measured over time.
The lawn should generally remain open except during necessary repair, turf establishment, or clearly identified safety concerns.
Every closure should clearly state its reason, affected area, start date, and expected reopening date.
Where possible, maintenance should rotate between sections rather than closing the entire lawn for extended periods.
The city should publish the conditions used to close and reopen the lawn, such as turf coverage, repair progress, or safety conditions.
Appearance, durability, and actual public availability should all be treated as measures of success, rather than optimizing only for untouched grass.
Shared space
A genuinely usable neighborhood lawn matters to everyone who wants to spend time, move, or rest close to home.
This is not a dog park campaign, and it does not seek exclusive access for pets. The issue is whether a shared community lawn is meaningfully available to the whole neighborhood.
Shared principles
In progress
These are ongoing or planned activities. An item will appear as completed only after it happens.
Collecting resident experiences and observations
Documenting open, closed, and unclear lawn conditions
Reviewing the park's original plans and turf-management information
Preparing formal requests to Taipei City
Planning outreach to relevant councilors and agencies
Researching rotating-maintenance and long-term solutions
Building a transparent public record
Join the discussion
If you also want the central lawn at Zhenhua Park to remain available under a reasonable maintenance policy, join the LINE OpenChat.
Do not share phone numbers, home addresses, exact residential locations, government IDs, children's information, or other sensitive personal data.
No. We support necessary and proportionate maintenance. The concern is whether closures are excessively long, unnecessarily broad, or insufficiently explained.
Responsible pet owners are part of the initiative, but this is not a dog park campaign and it does not seek exclusive access for pets. It concerns a shared lawn intended for the whole community.
No. Repair, turf establishment, extreme weather, or a clear safety issue may justify temporary closure. We are asking for limited, proportionate closures with clear notices and objective reopening standards.
Formal requests and direct contact with the city are part of the effort. Community feedback helps show that this is a broader public-space management issue rather than one person's complaint.